Preston Stearns vs Nathan Ponwith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Nov at 07:26 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Stearns vs N. Ponwith

USA
2
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Stearns 2 - 1 Ponwith
They have played 7 sets in total, with Preston Stearns winning 4 and Nathan Ponwith winning 3. The last match between Preston Stearns and Nathan Ponwith was at the M25 Columbus, 11-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Preston Stearns getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stearns | 2 |
| Ponwith | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Columbus(11-11-25)
(Q1) Columbus Challenger(09-17-23)
(Q1) M15 Naples(02-21-22)
P. Stearns vs N. Ponwith H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 40.91% (18-26) | Career Total W/L | 52.34% (190-173) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 2 | Indoor | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Stearns vs N. Ponwith Match Preview:
- Serves: Preston Stearns has recently performed better on their second serve, winning 49.73% of points compared to Nathan Ponwith's 41.82%. Could this be a significant advantage for Stearns?
- Return Game: On second serve returns, Stearns secures 44.67% versus Ponwith's 42.55%. On first serves, it's closer with Stearns at 28.31% and Ponwith at 27.49%.
- Pressure Moments: Stearns is stronger under pressure, saving 66.36% of breakpoints, while Ponwith saves 54.86%. Does this suggest Stearns might handle tense situations better?
- Match Wins: Over the last year, Stearns has a slightly better win ratio at 46.15%, compared to Ponwith's 32.43%.
- Preferred Surface: Stearns excels on hard courts, winning 43%, whereas Ponwith performs well on clay, also with a 43% win rate.
- Event Level: Recently, Stearns has a better win rate of 40% in lower-tier events compared to Ponwith’s 29.03%.
- Head-to-Head: They are evenly matched with one win each. Stearns won their last encounter.
- Quality of Opponents: Stearns has faced tougher opponents on average, playing against those ranked 316.46, compared to Ponwith's average opponent rank of 417.57.
- Deciding Sets: Ponwith slightly outperforms in deciding sets, winning 44% of them against Stearns’ 38%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Stearns has been more effective, converting 40.74% of breakpoints versus Ponwith’s 24.71%.
Editorial Prediction (November 11, 2025, UTC):
Preston Stearns shows notable strengths in both serving and returning second serves, which could heavily influence the match's outcome against Nathan Ponwith.
The ability to perform under pressure is a key advantage for Stearns, reflected in his higher breakpoint save percentage. His recent victory over Ponwith and better conversion of breakpoints are telling signs of his form.
Nathan Ponwith, however, shows better performance in deciding set situations, which might give him a slight edge if the match goes the distance. Nonetheless, Stearns’ overall consistency and the quality of opponents he has faced provide a favorable outlook.
Considering recent performance metrics and head-to-head history, Preston Stearns is the more likely winner in their upcoming match.
Preston Stearns vs Nathan Ponwith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Stearns vs N. Ponwith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 36 | Games Won | 35 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:28:33 | Average Match Time | 1:28:33 |
| 50% (80/161) | 1st Serve % | 48% (79/165) |
| 83% (66/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (58/79) |
| 52% (42/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (41/86) |
| 41% (7/17) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 40% (66/165) | Return Points Win % | 33% (53/161) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Stearns Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | ||
N. Ponwith Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-2 | ||

P. Stearns vs N. Ponwith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.91% (18/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.34% (190/173) |
| 44.23% (46/58) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.56% (430/404) |
| 47.61% (487/536) | Games Win/Loss | 50.74% (3953/3838) |
| 43.48% (10/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.44% (140/122) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (40/32) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 115 | Aces Total | 746 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 144 | Total Double Faults | 987 |
| 1:24:34 | Average Match Time | 1:19:34 |
| 350.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.45 |
| 60% (1419/2370) | 1st Serve % | 57% (10390/18072) |
| 66% (934/1419) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (6870/10390) |
| 47% (451/951) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3797/7682) |
| 39% (75/194) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (698/1700) |
| 37% (867/2314) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6797/17556) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Challenger W/L | 29.41% (20/48) |
| 41.67% (15/21) | Futures W/L | 57.63% (170/125) |
| 41% (18/44) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (189/360) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 43% (6/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (40/83) |
| 38% (6/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (58/108) |
| 70% (20/14) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (194/160) |
| 30% (20/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (194/34) |
| 17% (24/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (169/29) |